Editorial Standards

How DV Support earns and keeps survivor trust

Every legal or clinical article is written by trauma-informed researchers, double-reviewed by licensed professionals, and refreshed on a documented schedule. Below is the exact playbook we follow.

Editorial leads

Evelyn Grant, LLM · Amelia Reyes, MSW

Survivors’ Rights Attorney · Trauma Counsellor

Rotating roster of 10 licensed lawyers & trauma counsellors.

Last audited

June 2026 (updates logged in our publishing register)

Contact

team@dv.support

Editorial board

10-person rotating review council

We assign every draft to one legal expert and one trauma counsellor. The roster below rotates so no single reviewer becomes a bottleneck and specialties align with each topic.

Amelia Reyes, MSW

Trauma Counsellor

Crisis response & survivor brief development

Clinical reviewer

Priya Nadar, LCSW

Clinical Social Worker

Immigration trauma & safety planning

Clinical reviewer

Gabriel Méndez, PhD

Clinical Psychologist

Technology-facilitated abuse & behavioral science

Clinical reviewer

Lila Thompson, LMFT

Trauma-Focused Therapist

Family systems and custody transitions

Clinical reviewer

Harper Liu, LPC

Crisis Counsellor

Shelter intake & support group facilitation

Clinical reviewer

Daniel Cho, JD

Family Lawyer · 18 years experience

Protection orders, enforcement, and strategy

Legal reviewer

Soraya Patel, JD

Cross-Border Family Lawyer

Immigration-linked DV cases & Hague matters

Legal reviewer

Marcus Bell, JD

Former DV Prosecutor

Criminal process & evidence preservation

Legal reviewer

Evelyn Grant, LLM

Survivors’ Rights Attorney

Housing, benefits, and appellate advocacy

Legal reviewer

Karim Okafor, LLB

Family & Immigration Lawyer

Custody across borders & newcomer protections

Legal reviewer

How content is written

Evidence-backed, survivor-led writing

Writers work from structured briefs that demand primary sources, interviews with advocates, and trauma-informed language checks. Every sentence that states a fact must cite a trusted institution and render as a footnote in the article body.

Survivor-first reporting

Articles begin with a survivor brief. Our writers interview advocates, cross-check hotline trends, and document trauma-informed language before the first draft is written.

Plain-language legal guidance

Every fact must be cited with numbered superscripts (CDC, WHO, Justice Canada, US DOJ, National DV Hotline, peer-reviewed journals, provincial/State statutes).

Context + next steps

Practical next actions are mandatory: forms to download, offices to contact, questions to ask a lawyer, or safety planning prompts.

How content is reviewed

Four-layer editorial & legal review

1. Draft & self-check

  • Writers log every citation inside our CMS and attach PDF copies of statutes or studies.
  • AI tools may summarize long rulings but cannot write final copy; humans verify every line.

2. Subject-matter legal review

  • A licensed family lawyer (18+ yrs avg experience) verifies accuracy, jurisdictional nuance, and practical viability.
  • Conflicts-of-interest are declared before review assignments (see policy below).

3. Clinical & lived-experience review

  • A trauma counsellor and a survivor advisor confirm tone, accessibility, and safety guidance.
  • High-risk resources (immigration, housing, tech safety) receive an additional digital-safety review.

4. Final editorial QA

  • An editor confirms citations render as superscripts, links open in new tabs with accurate rel attributes, and structured data is current.
  • Updates are logged in the publishing register with reviewer names and timestamps.

Update schedule

Cadence by topic

Each resource automatically enters our refresh queue. Urgent legislative changes trigger an immediate re-review.

Monthly

Protection orders, restraining orders, and criminal procedure guides.

Quarterly

Immigration, custody, housing subsidies, and cross-border enforcement topics.

Real-time

Emergency alerts, recall notices, policy changes impacting survivor safety (published within 48 hours).

Citations

Cite everything

Writers cite CDC, WHO, Justice Canada, U.S. DOJ, National Domestic Violence Hotline, state/provincial statutes, and peer-reviewed journals. Statements like “Emotional abuse often escalates” must display as “Emotional abuse often escalates.^1”. Each footnote links to the primary source and is mirrored in our internal source register.

Conflict of interest policy

Reviewers must disclose active cases, client relationships, or paid partnerships tied to a topic. Conflicted experts are recused and a second reviewer is appointed. Sponsored content is labelled and cannot bypass the editorial workflow.

Responsible AI usage

AI assistance is limited to brainstorming outlines, summarizing legislation, or generating alt text drafts. AI-generated prose is never published verbatim. Every citation must reference the original statute or study, not an AI output.

Corrections & feedback

Submit corrections to team@dv.support with the article URL, quoted passage, and supporting source. We acknowledge within 2 business days, investigate within 7, and publish redlines + timestamps at the bottom of the article.

Corrections

See something that needs to change?

Email team@dv.support with the subject “Editorial correction”. Include the URL, quotation, and the authoritative source. We publish correction notes on-page and in our monthly transparency report.

View transparency report

Want the full process? Read our Editorial Standards.

Metrics are updated monthly and sourced from DV Support analytics + partner directories.